Deleted *Perfectly Imperfect* Due September 18 (girl); Winton, California 152 posts
15th May '12

Deleted this post

♛ Spectacular.#4 4 kids; Alabama 19636 posts
15th May '12

I think it's f**king stupid/selfish to get a tattoo while pregnant.

ang_turtle+2.5 19 kids; Ohio 19590 posts
15th May '12
Quoting Amber1993:" so i read online that the only problems with getting tattoos while pregnant are infections and if its too close to your due date, the pain can put you in early labor. what does everyone else think? "


the safety of my baby is more important, it's not worth taking a risk that something might happen, how hard is it to just wait til after the baby is born???

Rinnie & Addy B. Due November 1 (boy); 33 kids; Illinois 2420 posts
15th May '12

wouldn't risk it, as much as I want to, my husband offered to pay to get one of mine fixed for mother's day but I said no because i'm pregnant.

whitneynator 1 child; Iowa 4114 posts
15th May '12

Why risk it? I'd wait. Plus any reputable place would not tattoo a pregnant woman

nursemaya mom to 3! 3 kids; 5 angel babies; Minnesota 16002 posts
15th May '12
Quoting ♛ Rudeness. #3:" I think it's f**king stupid/selfish to get a tattoo while pregnant."


so true

✿LilyBear09✿ 1 child; Oregon 5006 posts
15th May '12

Just wait. It's not that long. If its a good idea now, it will be a good idea 9 months from now.

Maegan(FAKER)'s 2 kids; Tucson, Arizona 5332 posts
15th May '12

Damn she just asked a question. Personally I would just wait till baby came because the risk of infection is high.

The Icebox {MBRD} 17 kids; New Mexico 18558 posts
15th May '12
Quoting Maegan(FAKER)'s:" Damn she just asked a question. Personally I would just wait till baby came because the risk of infection is high. "


Which is what does everybody think.

Its incredibly stupid and selfish imo

Candis♥ 34 kids; Missouri 10350 posts
15th May '12

I'd wait....plus no place that I know of will tattoo a woman if they know she is pregnant. So if they won't risk it, I most definitely wouldn't.

*Perfectly Imperfect* Due September 18 (girl); Winton, California 152 posts
15th May '12

why is it selfish? nothing shows anything about the baby being harmed. but if the needles are opened in front of you, they are sterile

Candis♥ 34 kids; Missouri 10350 posts
15th May '12
Quoting The Icebox {MBRD}:" Which is what does everybody think. Its incredibly stupid and selfish imo"


I was seriously about to post that :) haha Don't ask a question if you don't want the opinion of other ladies.

☮Sugar Magnolia 1 child; Indiana 18293 posts
15th May '12

No, it's stupid. And any shop that values their reputation and services wouldn't touch a pregnant woman with a ten foot pole.

nursemaya mom to 3! 3 kids; 5 angel babies; Minnesota 16002 posts
15th May '12
Quoting whitneynator:" Why risk it? I'd wait. Plus any reputable place would not tattoo a pregnant woman"



Anyone that allows a pregnant woman is obviously desparate or fishy. If they are good they don't need to take pregnant or breastfeeding women to fill the schedule - they will have enough other people claiming those spots. I wouldn't want a tattoo from someone that was shitty or fishy enough to tattoo me while pregnant

ang_turtle+2.5 19 kids; Ohio 19590 posts
15th May '12
Quoting Amber1993:" why is it selfish? nothing shows anything about the baby being harmed. but if the needles are opened in front of you, they are sterile"


but there's always a chance of something happening, and i wouldn't take any chance of something if i knew there was even a 1 in a million chance of something happening to my baby