Reply

Cast Your Vote:

    • 1. -- Votes: 36
    • 2-4 -- Votes: 55
    • 5-8 -- Votes: 35
    • 9-11 -- Votes: 34
    • 12-16 -- Votes: 17
    • 17-20 -- Votes: 13
    • 21-25 -- Votes: 8
    • 26-30 -- Votes: 8
    • 31-35 -- Votes: 7
    • 36+ -- Votes: 21
Supafly★ 2 kids; Poland 14109 posts
23rd Nov '12
Quoting dat uterus tho:" <blockquote><b>Quoting Supafly★:</b>" She doesn't have to. But if she can't ... [snip!] ... and stay away, she's a slut. "</blockquote> I think that's even more asinine than putting a number on the term."


So if a woman slept with your SO? You'd be totally fine with it because she's allowed to sleep with who she wants and it doesn't matter if she's breaking up a relationship with a child on the way....right?



Sorry but I have to call bullshit on that.

. , Richmond, VA, United States 74567 posts
23rd Nov '12
Quoting Supafly★:" I think you misunderstood me. A woman who knowingly sleeps with another woman's SO is a slut to me whether I know the guy or not. ETA: Knowingly. "

I agree with this too.

HopingforaMiracle 1 child; USA 22533 posts
status 23rd Nov '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting Supafly★:</b>" Douchebag, a*****e, whatever choice word you feel like coming up with. "</blockquote>




Ok

Kaleighshaleigh 3 kids; USA 5703 posts
23rd Nov '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting Supafly★:</b>" Of course she CAN but it's not a very nice thing to do. The real definition of the word was just posted and "immoral" was used. "</blockquote>




Promiscuous was used also and that also has a definition. It is. " sexual relations with numerous partners on a casual basis."

Vivialopod 2 kids; Vantaa, Finland 42775 posts
23rd Nov '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting Supafly★:</b>" So if a woman slept with your SO? You'd be totally fine with it because she's allowed to sleep with ... [snip!] ... matter if she's breaking up a relationship with a child on the way....right? Sorry but I have to call bullshit on that. "</blockquote>




I'd have nothing against her. I'd place the blame where it belongs: on the man who committed his life and his p***s to me. She didn't break up my relationship. he did.

Vivialopod 2 kids; Vantaa, Finland 42775 posts
23rd Nov '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting Kaleighshaleigh:</b>" <blockquote><b>Quoting Supafly★:</b>" Of course she CAN but it's not a very ... [snip!] ... Promiscuous was used also and that also has a definition. It is. " sexual relations with numerous partners on a casual basis.""</blockquote>




And "numerous" is subjective., it could be two. Calling a girl a slut fir having two sexual partners seems harsh.

Supafly★ 2 kids; Poland 14109 posts
23rd Nov '12
Quoting dat uterus tho:" <blockquote><b>Quoting Supafly★:</b>" So if a woman slept with your SO? You'd ... [snip!] ... the blame where it belongs: on the man who committed his life and his p***s to me. She didn't break up my relationship. he did."


It takes 2 people to have sex. Unless the guy rapes the woman, it's her fault as much as his. Unless of course he fed her some bullshit about being single and she believed it. Then she's not at fault.

Kaleighshaleigh 3 kids; USA 5703 posts
23rd Nov '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting dat uterus tho:</b>" <blockquote><b>Quoting Kaleighshaleigh:</b>" <blockquote><b>Quoting Supafly★:</b>" ... [snip!] ... And "numerous" is subjective., it could be two. Calling a girl a slut fir having two sexual partners seems harsh."</blockquote>




Maybe so, but those that said 36 +.... Would that be considered numerous?

Vivialopod 2 kids; Vantaa, Finland 42775 posts
23rd Nov '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting Supafly★:</b>" It takes 2 people to have sex. Unless the guy rapes the woman, it's her fault as much as his. Unless ... [snip!] ... as much as his. Unless of course he fed her some bullshit about being single and she believed it. Then she's not at fault. "</blockquote>



She has no commitment to me. It's not her responsibility to be faithful to me. If she'd turned him down it wouldn't have changed the fact that he was willing to cheat on me. The blame is his and ONLY his.

. , Richmond, VA, United States 74567 posts
23rd Nov '12
Quoting dat uterus tho:" <blockquote><b>Quoting Supafly★:</b>" It takes 2 people to have sex. Unless ... [snip!] ... If she'd turned him down it wouldn't have changed the fact that he was willing to cheat on me. The blame is his and ONLY his."

He's the only one that can cheat on you but some people may still see it as slutty for her part in it.

Vivialopod 2 kids; Vantaa, Finland 42775 posts
23rd Nov '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting Kaleighshaleigh:</b>" <blockquote><b>Quoting dat uterus tho:</b>" <blockquote><b>Quoting Kaleighshaleigh:</b>" ... [snip!] ... sexual partners seems harsh."</blockquote> Maybe so, but those that said 36 +.... Would that be considered numerous?"</blockquote>




Considering I'm over 70, probably not done, and don't consider that a lot...no, not really.

Vivialopod 2 kids; Vantaa, Finland 42775 posts
23rd Nov '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting Δ ☮ ∂:</b>" He's the only one that can cheat on you but some people may still see it as slutty for her part in it."</blockquote>




Obviously, they do, since we're arguing about it.



I think their views are wrong.

Kaleighshaleigh 3 kids; USA 5703 posts
23rd Nov '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting dat uterus tho:</b>" <blockquote><b>Quoting Kaleighshaleigh:</b>" <blockquote><b>Quoting dat ... [snip!] ... numerous?"</blockquote> Considering I'm over 70, probably not done, and don't consider that a lot...no, not really."</blockquote>



You wouldn't consider over 70 sexual partners as being numerous?

. , Richmond, VA, United States 74567 posts
23rd Nov '12
Quoting dat uterus tho:" <blockquote><b>Quoting Δ ☮ ∂:</b>" He's the only one that can cheat ... [snip!] ... for her part in it."</blockquote> Obviously, they do, since we're arguing about it. I think their views are wrong."

Obviously. Just saying, she may have no commitment to you but that doesn't mean she's not slutty.

Vivialopod 2 kids; Vantaa, Finland 42775 posts
23rd Nov '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting Kaleighshaleigh:</b>" <blockquote><b>Quoting dat uterus tho:</b>" <blockquote><b>Quoting Kaleighshaleigh:</b>" ... [snip!] ... consider that a lot...no, not really."</blockquote> You wouldn't consider over 70 sexual partners as being numerous?"</blockquote>



No. I'll get back to you when I hit triple digits.