Reply
SubLowe 1 child; Oceanside, California 15389 posts
20th Dec '12
Quoting *Momlette*:" <blockquote><b>Quoting OneLoveMama:</b>" yes .. ok .. but that does not mean the government ... [snip!] ... Why would the government not do this? Who cares if we are not financially stable...peopke in government are still rich..."


the goverment does. this country does. this country .. all it cares about is money and luxary! People immigrate here to have a better life. to make money to send home to their countries to feed their families. I just dont believe it. Its a very far stretched theory. The terrorists have many more reasons to hate this country and want to attack it then our own government who is putting money into this country day in and day out

SubLowe 1 child; Oceanside, California 15389 posts
20th Dec '12
Quoting Danielle: Jack&Basil'sMom:" <blockquote><b>Quoting OneLoveMama:</b>" also these people can make a bomb out of ... [snip!] ... bombs/weapons on a plane"</blockquote> Why bother to crash a plane into a building you've already set up with bombs?"


easy. to kill more people, to make it more tragic, to attack more then one place at the same time. The pentagon wasnt blown up, just the plane crashed into it. The white house didnt blow up even though the plane never made it there. the buildings were harder to take down.

Momlette of 3 Due December 25 (girl); 3 kids; Ohio 25512 posts
20th Dec '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting OneLoveMama:</b>" the goverment does. this country does. this country .. all it cares about is money and luxary! People ... [snip!] ... to hate this country and want to attack it then our own government who is putting money into this country day in and day out"</blockquote>




Idk...idk what to think. I think either are possible and we shouldnt be narrowminded about our government. It has done corrupt things in the past.

Momlette of 3 Due December 25 (girl); 3 kids; Ohio 25512 posts
20th Dec '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting Loveislouder:</b>" Ah so you're one of those....."</blockquote>




What does that mean?

SubLowe 1 child; Oceanside, California 15389 posts
20th Dec '12
Quoting *Momlette*:" <blockquote><b>Quoting OneLoveMama:</b>" the goverment does. this country does. this ... [snip!] ... I think either are possible and we shouldnt be narrowminded about our government. It has done corrupt things in the past."


omg of course! Even this election was corrupted . I think there are a lot of things the govt is hiding from us, but that doesnt mean they would turn on their own people.

khigh 1 child; Fort Sill, Oklahoma 8101 posts
20th Dec '12
Quoting *Momlette*:" <blockquote><b>Quoting Loveislouder:</b>" Ah so you're one of those....."</blockquote> What does that mean?"


Watch something other than Loose Change. The guy who made that "documentary" is a psycho.



I don't trust the government as far as I can throw them, but they did not fly planes into buildings. I'm a prepper and I prep for complete government takeover and Agenda 21 implementation, and even I don't think 9/11 was an inside job.

Momlette of 3 Due December 25 (girl); 3 kids; Ohio 25512 posts
20th Dec '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting khigh:</b>" Watch something other than Loose Change. The guy who made that "documentary" is a psycho. I don't trust ... [snip!] ... and I prep for complete government takeover and Agenda 21 implementation, and even I don't think 9/11 was an inside job."</blockquote>




Was he really a psycho? Lol I just think people should be morw openminded to these things rather thsn blindly following the government and believing everything they say.

khigh 1 child; Fort Sill, Oklahoma 8101 posts
20th Dec '12
Quoting *Momlette*:" <blockquote><b>Quoting khigh:</b>" Watch something other than Loose Change. The guy ... [snip!] ... should be morw openminded to these things rather thsn blindly following the government and believing everything they say."


http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842



That's the Popular Mechanics article. The next link is to the Huffington Post talking about when the Loose Change director was arrested in 2011 for dealing HEROIN. He's really credible, huh?



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/31/loose-change-911-conspira_n_816544.html

Momlette of 3 Due December 25 (girl); 3 kids; Ohio 25512 posts
20th Dec '12

<blockquote><b>Quoting khigh:</b>" http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842 That's the Popular Mechanics article. ... [snip!] ... dealing HEROIN. He's really credible, huh? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/31/loose-change-911-conspira_n_816544.html"</blockquote>




Thank you for that information.

Kristen Parris 2 kids; Virginia 1938 posts
20th Dec '12
Quoting ☮ Phuket:" hey we didnt write the artcile... i just found it interesting..."


Me too! I posted it last night and I agree that she brings up some things that could be plausible. I just wonder what happened to the guy in the woods!



I think too many people think the government is so horrible and out to get us all.

user banned San Antonio, Texas 1668 posts
20th Dec '12

The woman is a raving lunatic.



First, why would a journalist grill a child (who just witnessed schoolmates executed by a monster) with the details?



Second, there were lots of initial reports that ended up being categorically false...in the rush to be first at breaking news, each network failed at vetting the info they were receiving.



Third, why would there be so many inaccurate reports if the government had it all planned out? Why wouldn't they have the information ready to be fed to the news media, with every i dotted and t crossed?



Fourth, the mom was a known collector of firearms and such. So, the murderer didn't have to purchase the items himself. Just because he's shy around people, that makes him incapable of purchasing anything related to the shootings?



Fifth, I hope to Jeebus that nobody actually follows this loony's flawed logic to the same incongruous conclusion as she did.



Someone else posted this in another thread and I agree with this.

user banned 4 kids; Mueang Phuket, Thailand 30487 posts
20th Dec '12
Quoting ♡TillMyLastDayϖ:" The woman is a raving lunatic. First, why would a journalist grill a child (who just witnessed schoolmates ... [snip!] ... flawed logic to the same incongruous conclusion as she did. Someone else posted this in another thread and I agree with this."


yes they sure make a lot of vaild points..



Fat-and-Happy TTC since Mar 2008; 1 child; Texas 13915 posts
20th Dec '12

I think that it is natural and healthy to question the government. Are people just supposed to suppress their suspicions because it is disrespectful to speculate?



I don't know if it is true or not but it is one point of view and crazier things have happened.



Regardless, I'm sure the woman who wrote the article is now on some watch list lol

JamieP 3 kids; Newnan, Georgia 2063 posts
20th Dec '12

This all is pretty out there but I just stayed on that Idaho pickers YouTube channel for like 45 minutes watching his videos, that guy has way too much time on his hands. But I will say I have wondered why they didn't address the whole second shooter thing again. I watched the coverage live all day the day it happened and for half of the day they were saying two shooters and I was watching live when those cops took off looking like they were chasing someone through the woods. Then I eventually had to turn the news off because I had gotten nothing done that day but sitting in front of my tv crying and when I turned it back on they said the shooter was dead and I never heard the other reports addressed.

JamieP 3 kids; Newnan, Georgia 2063 posts
20th Dec '12

Oh but I do also know a very similar theory was developed about Columbine supposedly there were actually something like 6 shooters there.