Reply
Cordelia's Mom 33 kids; Bakersfield, California 3685 posts
Feb 17th '13
Quoting ♥MamaToSilas♥:" I know what you mean. This is what I mean by small. This is me the day before I got induced at 41 weeks. Everyone always assumed I was only in the mid 30s. Drove me nuts lol"


You don't look toooo small there but I would also guess like 35 weeks for that. Did you get a lot of stretch marks? I feel like that's the only upside is I might not get as many as I would if I was to get as big and round as other ladies.

Mandy ♥ Hailey+Roo 2 kids; Middleton, Idaho 11788 posts
Feb 17th '13

<blockquote><b>Quoting That one chick.:</b>" I have a feeling that's exactly what I'll look like. Looks way better at 37 weeks though.."</blockquote>



Here's my 39 week picture. Never got 40 because he was 4 days early.




http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y110/Ilikepenguin/New/93CAEFBD-21AA-4521-948E-8F23615FFCC5-14562-000008A13EDB56B9.jpg



Good thing about being small was I bounced back pretty fast. 1 month pp-



http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y110/Ilikepenguin/New/05B75A68-9831-480C-9BD5-753D11DE1307-14562-000008A14072B923.jpg

Mandy ♥ Hailey+Roo 2 kids; Middleton, Idaho 11788 posts
Feb 17th '13

<blockquote><b>Quoting ♥MamaToSilas♥:</b>" I know what you mean. This is what I mean by small. This is me the day before I got induced at 41 weeks. Everyone always assumed I was only in the mid 30s. Drove me nuts lol"</blockquote>




No one believed me, either. They told me that he would be really small. I measured 5-6 weeks behind. He was 7 lbs 5 oz and 20 inches.

Cordelia's Mom 33 kids; Bakersfield, California 3685 posts
Feb 17th '13
Quoting Mandy loves Hailey+Roo:" <blockquote><b>Quoting That one chick.:</b>" I have a feeling that's exactly what ... [snip!] ... pp- http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y110/Ilikepenguin/New/05B75A68-9831-480C-9BD5-753D11DE1307-14562-000008A14072B923.jpg"


aw your bump was really cute in that one!

Mandy ♥ Hailey+Roo 2 kids; Middleton, Idaho 11788 posts
Feb 17th '13

<blockquote><b>Quoting That one chick.:</b>" aw your bump was really cute in that one!"</blockquote>




I miss it now. He's a month old and I've already got baby fever.

Onalee's Mummy Due August 26 (boy); 1 child; Newcastle, Australia 5355 posts
Feb 17th '13

For your first baby looks fine. I'm a lot bigger quicker with number two

Mandy ♥ Hailey+Roo 2 kids; Middleton, Idaho 11788 posts
Feb 17th '13

<blockquote><b>Quoting Onalee's Mummy:</b>" For your first baby looks fine. I'm a lot bigger quicker with number two"</blockquote>




I was much smaller with my second.

Onalee's Mummy Due August 26 (boy); 1 child; Newcastle, Australia 5355 posts
Feb 18th '13

<blockquote><b>Quoting Mandy loves Hailey+Roo:</b>" <blockquote><b>Quoting Onalee's Mummy:</b>" For your first baby looks fine. I'm a lot bigger quicker with number two"</blockquote> I was much smaller with my second."</blockquote>




Really? My ob said its normal to get bigger quicker as you're body has stretched before. But then it will plateau.

Mandy ♥ Hailey+Roo 2 kids; Middleton, Idaho 11788 posts
Feb 18th '13

<blockquote><b>Quoting Onalee's Mummy:</b>" <blockquote><b>Quoting Mandy loves Hailey+Roo:</b>" <blockquote><b>Quoting ... [snip!] ... Really? My ob said its normal to get bigger quicker as you're body has stretched before. But then it will plateau."</blockquote>




I think it is for most people. I just didn't get big with my second. I stayed small. I was bigger at 31 weeks with my daughter than I was at 39 with my son.

Little Richard's mommie! Due July 12 (boy); 1 child; Seneca, South Carolina 4431 posts
Feb 21st '13

yepp I think so. This was me at 22 weeks
549161_4452072113047_604726584_n.jpg