Reply
HungryHippo 2 kids; Missouri 12139 posts
18th Feb '13

<blockquote><b>Quoting Sarah Bare-ah♡:</b>" How did it do that though? Unless it was suggested why would someone automatically assume she was in a from the waist down cast because he beat her?"</blockquote>




If it was a domestic violence joke she would have a black eye or something

KNZ. 3 kids; Washington 59253 posts
18th Feb '13
Quoting Sarah Bare-ah♡:" Exactly. The ecard was the only part of the joke when it first went viral. "


I think people offended by it are looking it as a whole, not realizing that. While the people who aren't (well, not 'all', but ya know) , know this haha.



So the two together, yeah, can be offensive.
But the top one-- would never assume it's a DV thing.

user banned (boy); 2 kids; Fucking, Austria 36337 posts
18th Feb '13
Quoting KNZ.:" usually only the top half, the "e-card" is what you see around the internet. the bottom half is a separate meme that people add to other things to change a joke around. "

I know that.



When you put both together. It's pretty evident as what they were trying to suggest.

Sarah ♥ K&K 2 kids; 2 angel babies; South Land, CA, United States 117051 posts
status 18th Feb '13
Quoting ♥ mj's mama:" Right, but the girl is hurt ON the ecard. It could be taken as DV joke OR because his p***s was so big it hurt her. That's why the bottom half was added on."


So because he has big anatomy its automatically a DV issue?

K. P. Walsh Due August 5 (girl); Japan 1385 posts
18th Feb '13
Quoting Sarah Bare-ah♡:" How did it do that though? Unless it was suggested why would someone automatically assume she was in a from the waist down cast because he beat her?"

I think you need to read between the lines here, though to understand what I'm saying.
The first part I automatically assumed it was a p***s joke. The second part insinuated that it could have been either a domestic violence joke or a p***s joke..
If it was just the top part, it never would have occurred to me. But the second part DID suggest it..
So the overall thing "joke" is both, IMO.

Sarah ♥ K&K 2 kids; 2 angel babies; South Land, CA, United States 117051 posts
status 18th Feb '13
Quoting ℳary ℐane:" I know that. When you put both together. It's pretty evident as what they were trying to suggest."


So those people made a racial/dv suggestion. Doesnt mean the original person making the ecard is trying to imply that all black men are abusers.

Amber ♡ Due August 13 (boy); 1 child; Kansas 18757 posts
18th Feb '13
Quoting Sarah Bare-ah♡:" So because he has big anatomy its automatically a DV issue? "


That's not what I said at all.

user banned (boy); 2 kids; Fucking, Austria 36337 posts
18th Feb '13
Quoting KNZ.:" I think people offended by it are looking it as a whole, not realizing that. While the people who aren't ... [snip!] ... know) , know this haha. So the two together, yeah, can be offensive. But the top one-- would never assume it's a DV thing. "

Of course not.



OP is discussing the two together, That is what is going around on FB.

Amber ♡ Due August 13 (boy); 1 child; Kansas 18757 posts
18th Feb '13
Quoting Sarah Bare-ah♡:" So those people made a racial/dv suggestion. Doesnt mean the original person making the ecard is trying to imply that all black men are abusers."


Well that's how I took it. And that's why I think it's offensive.

KNZ. 3 kids; Washington 59253 posts
18th Feb '13
Quoting ℳary ℐane:" I know that. When you put both together. It's pretty evident as what they were trying to suggest."


Oh, well, duh. haha, the second half is stupid. and just doesn't fit with the first half.
i'm just saying it's dumb of whoever made the second, and dumb that anyone would suddenly change their view of the first one & be offended by just that half because of what the second is saying.

K. P. Walsh Due August 5 (girl); Japan 1385 posts
18th Feb '13
Quoting ℳary ℐane:" I know that. When you put both together. It's pretty evident as what they were trying to suggest."

That's what I'm trying to say, too.

user banned (boy); 2 kids; Fucking, Austria 36337 posts
18th Feb '13
Quoting Sarah Bare-ah♡:" So those people made a racial/dv suggestion. Doesnt mean the original person making the ecard is trying to imply that all black men are abusers."

I know this. Some dude made these two meme's into one. That is what we are discussing.

user banned 3 kids; Washington 15083 posts
18th Feb '13

I wasn't offended. I just didn't find it funny.

UhmAmber 1 child; Texas 2415 posts
18th Feb '13

guys... she can't walk. because his p***s was so big.
I think it's being taken way too seriously. :roll:

KNZ. 3 kids; Washington 59253 posts
18th Feb '13
Quoting Sarah Bare-ah♡:" So those people made a racial/dv suggestion. Doesnt mean the original person making the ecard is trying to imply that all black men are abusers."


okay, that's what i meant to say :D