Reply

Cast Your Vote:

    • Yes -- Votes: 58
    • No -- Votes: 27
    • other. Explain -- Votes: 8
Iron Man 6 kids; 1 angel baby; 1700 posts
21st Feb '13
Quoting
Arks Mama! ಠ_ಠ 1 child; Utah 2401 posts
21st Feb '13

Maybe there should be a 3 strike rule? I'm not 100% on how that would work though.
Maybe if you get so many reports, say 10 because of a comment, you get 10 reports, that is one strike, then another 10, 2 strikes, you get the drift.
Then again like someone said, if you don't like someones yewneek name you might get a few reports. /shrug

Iron Man 6 kids; 1 angel baby; 1700 posts
21st Feb '13
Quoting and then there were 3.:" Maybe there should be a 3 strike rule? I'm not 100% on how that would work though. Maybe if you get ... [snip!] ... you get the drift. Then again like someone said, if you don't like someones yewneek name you might get a few reports. /shrug "

And that's the thing...it gets too tough to determine what's reportable and what's not. I mean, then I could snap on anybody I don't agree with and report them, which would be just stupid. But some people would do it.

Arks Mama! ಠ_ಠ 1 child; Utah 2401 posts
21st Feb '13
Quoting Blue Song:" And that's the thing...it gets too tough to determine what's reportable and what's not. I mean, then ... [snip!] ... mean, then I could snap on anybody I don't agree with and report them, which would be just stupid. But some people would do it."


True. Or if they write a little bit why they are reporting, there could be more mods that determine if it's strike worthy?
Still, no idea. That's probably really difficult to do.

Mrs. Sherwood TTC since Jun 2013; 16 kids; Mesa, Arizona 3391 posts
21st Feb '13

I think there's definitely a difference between being an a*****e and being a bully/abusive to a person. If you strongly disagree with a person, that's very different than telling them to go kill themselves, that they're worthless as a mother, etc. I'm not sure really how to establish a clear line that all members have to abide by, but I do think bullying should be handled and not just ignored, as it often can be.

ßlack Rose ♥ 2 kids; 2 angel babies; Sharon, Oklahoma 5335 posts
21st Feb '13

I vote no, because really, its the internet. Its going to happen everywhere. And once that rule has been made, people will keep getting their feelings hurt over just any thing. We are all adults. Why should we have to censor ourselves?

Onalee's Mummy Due August 26 (boy); 1 child; Newcastle, Australia 5355 posts
21st Feb '13

<blockquote><b>Quoting Mrs. Sherwood:</b>" I think there's definitely a difference between being an a*****e and being a bully/abusive to a person. ... [snip!] ... line that all members have to abide by, but I do think bullying should be handled and not just ignored, as it often can be."</blockquote>



But it's already handled. That's why there's mods.

Mrs. Sherwood TTC since Jun 2013; 16 kids; Mesa, Arizona 3391 posts
21st Feb '13
Quoting Onalee's Mummy:" <blockquote><b>Quoting Mrs. Sherwood:</b>" I think there's definitely a difference ... [snip!] ... be handled and not just ignored, as it often can be."</blockquote> But it's already handled. That's why there's mods."

I know there are mods. But if it's already handled, then why the poll? I do think true bullies should be banned. Not someone who's an a*****e, but someone who is harassing another member, attacking someone etc - in my opinion it should be a bannable offense.

☆º×ß¡±©µ×º☆ Due September 18; 3 kids; 1 angel baby; Centralia, Washington 44160 posts
status 21st Feb '13

people should utilize the ignore feature problem solved

Jax 3 kids; Sydney, NS, Australia 2888 posts
21st Feb '13

<blockquote><b>Quoting

Onalee's Mummy Due August 26 (boy); 1 child; Newcastle, Australia 5355 posts
21st Feb '13

What happened to op? Did she just delete her account?

user banned (boy); 2 kids; Fucking, Austria 36337 posts
21st Feb '13
eta- oooops
Onalee's Mummy Due August 26 (boy); 1 child; Newcastle, Australia 5355 posts
21st Feb '13

<blockquote><b>Quoting ℳary ℐane:</b>" no. lol she was spammed out. If we see anymore. Don't respond. This b***h is just annoying now.. :lol:"</blockquote>




Ohhhh so she was the one who just posted those three posts?



Why did I have lunch...

user banned (boy); 2 kids; Fucking, Austria 36337 posts
21st Feb '13
Quoting Onalee's Mummy:" <blockquote><b>Quoting ℳary ℐane:</b>" no. lol she was spammed out. ... [snip!] ... now.. :lol:"</blockquote> Ohhhh so she was the one who just posted those three posts? Why did I have lunch..."

aww f**k. no I posted this in the wrong thread. LOL

Onalee's Mummy Due August 26 (boy); 1 child; Newcastle, Australia 5355 posts
21st Feb '13

<blockquote><b>Quoting ℳary ℐane:</b>" aww f**k. no I posted this in the wrong thread. LOL"</blockquote>




LOL.