Reply
☠BryBry'sMuM☠ Due March 19; 1 child; Fullerton, California 15229 posts
17th May '13
Quoting *Momlette*:" I don't see anything either sorry"

its all good.

BeccaTTC Due October 7; Los Angeles, California 14 posts
17th May '13

I have no problems seeing those lines I think congrats is in order. Blue dye are not that great. The .88 are positive

Pukey McPukerton Due January 15; Ontario 465 posts
17th May '13

<blockquote><b>Quoting BeccaTTC:</b>" I have no problems seeing those lines I think congrats is in order. Blue dye are not that great. The .88 are positive"</blockquote>




The first window shod have a + sign not just a line. I thought the same as you at first.

BeccaTTC Due October 7; Los Angeles, California 14 posts
17th May '13
Quoting MammiX6:" <blockquote><b>Quoting BeccaTTC:</b>" I have no problems seeing those lines I think ... [snip!] ... are positive"</blockquote> The first window shod have a + sign not just a line. I thought the same as you at first."


I know what it should have. I have used so many tests been ttc 6 years. Blue dye are not great. I think you should stick with pink dye n I still think you have your bfp :-) thinking of you when you testing again

BeccaTTC Due October 7; Los Angeles, California 14 posts
17th May '13

.88 are more sensitive then frer and of coarse blue dyes now. Frer used to be amazing but the last year they have been giving false negitives and indents that are insaine. They just are not sensitive anymore. That .88 was indeed a positive. I would re test with the .88.

☠BryBry'sMuM☠ Due March 19; 1 child; Fullerton, California 15229 posts
20th May '13

AF came Satureday.